The Three Leaks Diagnostic

Eighteen questions that tell you which of the Three Leaks is costing you most, which one to fix first, and what to do in the first three weeks. The order it gives you isn’t the order of your scores — it’s the order that works, and it explains why.

From Chapter 3. About ten minutes.

The Three Leaks Diagnostic

Eighteen questions. They tell you which of the Three Leaks is costing you most, which one to fix first, and what to do in the first three weeks.

Companion tool to The AI Content Paradox, Chapter 3. Answer honestly rather than aspirationally; a flattering score costs you the only useful thing this produces. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Automatic scoring is not running on this page. You can still answer every question below. If you are the site owner, this note means the page script was blocked or altered.

1

The Zero Governance Leak

AI tools, no documented standards. Every person uses AI differently.

If you asked each team member to describe their AI workflow, would they all describe the same one?
Do you have written documentation covering which tools to use for which content, how to structure prompts for your voice, what standards content must meet before human review, and when to use AI versus writing from scratch?
When someone new joins, do they get a documented process rather than figuring it out by watching?
Have you read two pieces of your own AI-assisted content and thought these don’t sound like the same company?
Can you state the average time-to-publish for AI-assisted content across your team?
Could you hand your brand voice documentation to a system today, as context, with no verbal explanation, and get output you’d publish?The Volume Test. It does not add to the score. Failing it raises the severity by one level.
2

The Legacy Workflow Leak

Old process, new tools. Every pre-AI gate kept, nothing eliminated.

Did you redesign your workflow when you implemented AI, rather than adding AI to the existing one?
Are you holding the same meetings, approvals, and review cycles you held before?
Does AI-assisted content take about the same calendar time to publish as pre-AI content did?
Do you have steps that exist to catch things AI shouldn’t be producing in the first place?
If you removed one person from a review cycle, would quality suffer?
If a piece were finished in four minutes, would it still take days to publish?The Volume Test. It does not add to the score. Failing it raises the severity by one level. Printed as an open question in the book; asked as yes/no here.
3

The Quality Control Leak

Under-checking and over-checking, usually at the same time.

Does AI content go through more review cycles than human-written content used to?
Do you have documented standards creators can check against before submitting?
Are senior people spending significant time rewriting rather than reviewing?
Do errors still reach publication despite multiple reviews?
Could you state your quality standards as ten specific, measurable criteria?
If your volume tripled next month, would your review process break, or would you review less?The Volume Test. It does not add to the score. Failing it raises the severity by one level. Printed as an open question in the book; asked as yes/no here.

Your diagnosis

Answer all eighteen questions and your diagnosis appears here.

Stop Wasting $$$ on AI

If the button does not respond, press Ctrl+P, or Cmd+P on a Mac, and choose Save as PDF.

AIContentCMO.com

Scored with The Three Leaks Diagnostic, the companion tool to The AI Content Paradox by Chantelle Kadala.

Run it again, and find the $10,000 Trap Calculator and the ROI Scorecard, at AIContentCMO.com/book-resources/paradox

The book is available on Amazon.

Content operations consulting: AIContentCMO.com/services

Each leak scores out of five, on the bands printed in Chapter 3: zero to one is solid, two to three is a moderate leak, four to five is severe. The sixth question in each set is the Volume Test. It does not change the score. Failing it raises that leak’s severity by one level, because a leak you can hold together today does not survive triple volume. The fix order is fixed: governance, then workflow, then quality. Governance first because a system executes standards and cannot invent them.